7 min.


In the intriguing tale of “The Big Polemic Online Wars,” we embark on a journey through various acts and plot twists:

The Online Migration: We observe the unexpected migration of Covid-19 deniers to the realm of climate change denial. Suspicion, misinformation, group dynamics, conspiracy theories, confirmation bias, and distrust in institutions all play their part in this peculiar journey.

The Techniques of the Polemic Wars: We delve into the world of polemics and its charming techniques. Playing the man, exaggerating the enemy’s views, waving the flag of virtue, below-the-belt hits, tapping into base instincts, mixing half-truths with lies, and circular reasoning are all part of this peculiar art form.

Online Goes Offline: The danger of addiction to echo chambers becomes evident. It’s a treacherous path where online extremism can lead to offline consequences. The line between the virtual and real worlds blurs, and we find ourselves trapped in a cycle of polarization and radicalization.

The Opening Act: Online extremism sets the stage for a disturbing political drama. Authoritarianism, extreme nationalism, xenophobia, anti-intellectualism, strongman leadership, and paramilitary groups become key characters in this unfolding plot.

The Endgame: In a surprising turn of events, those paramilitary groups emerge as the echo chambers themselves, shaping the narrative of a new world order. We realize that we’ve unwittingly stumbled into World War 3, not on a traditional battlefield, but in the vast and treacherous realm of the online world.

This surreal digital saga challenges the foundations of democracy, and its outcome remains uncertain. As we navigate this brave new world, we mustn’t underestimate the significance of the online battlefield, where information is the weapon of choice, and echo chambers serve as the training grounds for ideological soldiers. The next episode awaits in this ever-evolving narrative of the Big Polemic online Wars

The online migration

Oh, what a delightful journey we’ve witnessed in the vast expanse of online debates! The illustrious Covid-19 deniers, known for their fiery crusades, have embarked on a truly captivating migration – to the land of climate change denial. Who would’ve thought, right?

But let’s not be too hasty; we wouldn’t want to offend anyone’s sensibilities. So, let’s gently dissect this not-so-ironic journey into the world of Covid-19 and climate change skepticism (I promise, no offense intended):

Suspicion: Ah, yes, our dear antivaxers, renowned for their unyielding skepticism towards established scientific consensus. Naturally, this skepticism just needed a change of scenery, and voilà, climate science became their fresh target.

The Misinformation Playground: Isn’t the internet just the perfect breeding ground for misinformation? Those antivaxers, with their expertise in spreading and consuming falsehoods, simply couldn’t resist extending their talents to climate-related topics.

Group Dynamics: Both communities thrive on their close-knit group dynamics. The camaraderie they find among their like-minded peers, well, it’s practically a love story for the ages, reinforcing their beliefs and positions.

Conspiracy Theories: Ah, conspiracy theories – the great unifier. Whether it’s vaccine microchips or climate change as a grand hoax, these communities share an undeniable taste for the unconventional. Truly heartwarming.

Confirmation Bias: Why bother with broad scientific consensus when you can cherry-pick information that fits your narrative? Covid-19 and climate change skeptics are true masters of selective reasoning.

Distrust in Institutions: A common thread indeed – a profound distrust in mainstream institutions. They see themselves as the noble crusaders, valiantly battling against the forces of a deceitful establishment. Quite the hero’s journey.

So, while this migration from antivax flame wars to climate change denial may appear ironic, rest assured, it’s all perfectly sensible. It’s a heartwarming tale of skepticism, misinformation, camaraderie, and the undeniable allure of conspiracy theories.

As we traverse these digital battlegrounds, let us remember the importance of promoting critical thinking, fact-checking, and informed discourse. After all, we must keep the flames of productive debate alive, even if they were initially fueled by the Big Polemic online Wars.

The techniques of the Polemic Wars

How could I forget our delightful journey into the world of polemics and its charming techniques? Remember I promised you I would wrote about it? 

So, let’s break down those polemic techniques you find in all echo chambers, shall we?

Playing the Man: Oh, what a classy move! Instead of tackling the actual arguments, let’s attack the person. It’s like a playground insult contest for adults.

Exaggerating the Enemy’s Views: We’re masters at making those who disagree with us look like caricatures of themselves. Who cares about nuance when you can make them seem like monsters, right?

Waving the Flag of Virtue: We love to pretend we’re the saviors of humanity, fighting for freedom and the greater good. But really, we’re just after that shiny trophy of being absolutely right.

Below the Belt Hits: Nothing is off-limits in this game. We’ll stoop as low as needed to claim victory, even if it means hitting below the belt. Ouch!

Tapping into Base Instincts: Let’s appeal to people’s primal urges, because why bother with rational discourse when we can manipulate emotions?

Mixing Half-Truths with Lies: We’re artists at blending real facts with fabrications. Who needs integrity when you can craft your own reality?

Circular Reasoning: Round and round we go, using our own claims to prove our point. It’s like arguing with a broken record.

Appeal to the Masses: Who needs science when you can just shout your opinion loudly and hope others follow suit?

Distrusting Everything: Scientists, media, politicians – let’s just call everyone suspicious if they don’t agree with us. That’s the way to go!

So, polemic is an art form, but not one you should willingly dive into. We should aim for distance, rationality, and open dialogue, even though we secretly know that most discussions are a messy tangle of biases and hidden agendas. But hey, admitting that would just be too reasonable, wouldn’t it?

Online goes offline.

We better ignore the Big Polemic online Wars.  After all, they are harmless, no. No? No they are not, sorry folks.

Ah, the allure of those cozy echo chambers;  It’s a bit like falling into a rabbit hole, isn’t it? But here’s the irony: we often underestimate the danger of these digital havens.

Addiction to Echo Chambers: It’s like the siren song of the internet, luring us into the sweet embrace of echo chambers. We keep coming back for that comforting dose of affirmation, where our beliefs are constantly validated. It’s almost like a warm, ideological hug that we can’t resist.

The Temptation to Fight: Of course, we can’t just sit idly by, right? We feel the urge to jump into the fray and combat the misinformation with facts. But here’s the catch: those echo chambers are like quicksand. The more you struggle, the deeper you sink. Suddenly, you’re knee-deep in a bloody flame war, and there’s no turning back.

Feeding Ground for Extremism: Little do we realize that these echo chambers are the fertile soil where seeds of extremism grow. The more we engage, the more polarized we become. It’s like a never-ending cycle of radicalization, and before you know it, you’ve unwittingly wandered into the danger zone.

Blurred Lines Between Online and Offline: Here’s the kicker – for most, the line between the online and offline worlds has disappeared. What happens online doesn’t stay online. It spills over into our real lives, affecting our beliefs, actions, and even our political choices. It’s like a virus that infects the mind and society.

So, in this ironic dance of digital addiction, we mustn’t underestimate the power of echo chambers to shape our reality. What we feed our minds online can have very real consequences offline. It’s a cautionary tale of how the pursuit of information purity can lead us down a treacherous path.

The opening act

Online extremism seems to be the opening act for a rather unsettling political drama. It’s getting harder and harder to turn a blind eye to what started online and is now becoming mainstream:.

Authoritarianism: Who needs those pesky democratic institutions anyway? 

Nationalism: Ah, the charm of extreme nationalism – where your nation needs to be protected against all evil. 

Xenophobia: It’s like a villain origin story: the demonization of anyone different. Hate speech and discrimination are all the rage, as if embracing diversity were an unforgivable plot twist.

Anti-Intellectualism: Intellectualism? Extremists prefer their ideology served with a side of simplicity and emotional appeal, as if complex issues could be resolved with a catchphrase.

Strongman Leadership: Cue the charismatic leader with a penchant for authoritarian rule. They promise to fix everything and make the nation “great again,” as if they hold the script to the ultimate success story.

Paramilitary or Vigilante Groups: It’s like a subplot involving those mysterious armed groups that operate outside the law, intimidating or attacking political opponents. A dash of lawlessness adds a thrilling twist.

The Endgame

Ah, the irony of it all! It’s like a never-ending loop, isn’t it? Those paramilitary groups are the very echo chambers we started with – talk about a plot twist! They’ve evolved from being the outliers to the main characters in this drama, and they might as well be writing the final chapters of the democratic civilization we’ve known since World War II.

Yes, you heard it right – forget about traditional world wars with battlefields and borders. We’ve unwittingly stumbled into World War 3, but not in the Ukraine, my friends, but right here in the vast and treacherous realm of the online world.

It’s a war of ideas, influence, and narratives, fought with keyboards and screens instead of tanks and trenches. The battleground is the digital landscape, where information is the weapon of choice, and echo chambers serve as the training grounds for ideological soldiers.

So, as we find ourselves in the midst of this peculiar Big Polemic online War, let’s not underestimate its significance. The online battlefield may be virtual, but the consequences are very real. It’s a war that challenges the very foundations of democracy, and the outcome is still uncertain. Stay tuned for the next episode in this surreal digital saga!

I found it necessary to write this article because we are living in an era of unprecedented digital transformation, where online discourse and extremism have a profound impact on our lives. The migration of online debates, the techniques of polemics, and the allure of echo chambers are shaping our perceptions, beliefs, and even our political landscape in ways we may not fully comprehend. It’s essential to shed light on these dynamics and their potential consequences.

I believe that by examining these phenomena and their parallels, we can foster a deeper understanding of the challenges we face in the digital age. We must recognize that the line between online and offline realities is blurring, and what happens in the virtual realm can have very tangible effects on society, politics, and even democracy itself.

This article serves as a wake-up call, urging readers to critically assess their online behaviors, question the information they consume, and engage in informed discourse. It highlights the importance of safeguarding the principles of democracy, which are increasingly at risk in this new digital battleground.